YouTube has admitted to digitally polishing creators Shorts without their knowledge, following a growing wave of confusion and complaints about videos looking altered. The company acknowledged it had been “experimenting” with subtle machine learning enhancements on select Shorts tweaks like sharpening and noise reduction intended to improve clarity but carried out without the creators consent.
The issue first gained widespread attention when musician and YouTuber Rick Beato noticed a clip of his interview with Pearl Jam guitarist Mike Mc-Cready on YouTube Shorts looked off, almost as if it had been filtered. He posted a viral video about the change, prompting many other creators to share similar examples of their Shorts being altered. In response,
YouTube acknowledged that it has been applying machine learning-powered video enhancements ( ML ) to Shorts behind the scenes. These tweaks include reducing noise, improving lighting, sharpening images, and subtly altering frames. While the platform describes these as “traditional ML enhancements,” many creators argue they cross a line by editing videos without consent.
Also Read: Netflix Under Fire in Poland: UOKiK Alleges Unauthorized Fee Hikes
Creators began noticing something odd: their Shorts looked different from the original uploads. In some cases, videos appeared sharper but also unnatural almost AI-generated. When pressed, YouTube confirmed that enhancements were being applied automatically to improve user experience. The problem? Creators weren’t told.
This raises serious questions about authenticity, transparency, and control. For influencers, artists, and storytellers, the raw look and feel of a video can be part of their creative identity. Automated alterations may dilute that identity, leaving creators frustrated.
YouTube insists that these are not “AI edits” but machine learning adjustments aimed at making videos look clearer across devices. Still, critics argue the distinction is thin. Whether AI or ML, the edits were done without permission, which undermines trust.
Some analysts warn this could be the beginning of a larger trend where platforms quietly use automation to shape how content looks and feels, prioritizing viewer metrics over creator intent. The company is already seeing over 200 billion views per day on Shorts, which translates into significant revenue for creators. Does using AI change that model for both sides? Almost certainly. YouTube will need to be smart with its plans and communicate clearly with the community to avoid a heavy backlash and preserve trust in the future of digital creativity.
Social media platforms thrive on creator trust. Many influencers are now voicing concern on X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and YouTube forums, demanding an opt-out option or at least full disclosure when enhancements are applied. Some say their videos no longer represent their artistic choices, while others worry about losing credibility with audiences who might suspect over-editing.
In its statement, YouTube stressed that these enhancements were intended to “deliver a better viewing experience” and that they don’t fundamentally alter the content. Yet creators aren’t convinced. Social media platforms thrive on creator trust, and many influencers are voicing concern on X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and YouTube forums, demanding an opt-out option or at least full disclosure when enhancements are applied. Some say their videos no longer reflect their artistic choices, while others fear losing credibility with audiences who might suspect over-editing. The company promised to review feedback and consider changes moving forward.
The revelation that YouTube has been covertly using machine learning to improve Shorts has sparked a heated discussion about permission, creativity, and power. The producers contend that the lack of transparency weakens their voice, even though the changes may make videos appear better to casual viewers. The key question at hand is whether YouTube will return control to creators or if this marks the beginning of a future in which platforms will determine how material is displayed.